6/25/2023
Some in-depth thoughts and data on the implosion of the Ocean Gate submersible.
These data points emphasize the immense pressures experienced at various depths in the ocean and highlight the significant challenges posed by exploring the deep-sea environment.
These observations highlight why more people have traveled to space than have ventured into the deepest parts of our oceans.
In contrast to commercial aviation, the implosion of the Ocean Gate submersible reveals the lack of regulatory oversight in international waters. While the company had to register the parent vessel for transportation from Canada, operations in open waters are minimally regulated. As a lover of engineering, it is challenging to illustrate my feeling because while I appreciate the ambition and thought, I also understand the importance of safety measures and protocols.
Aviation serves as an example of a highly regulated industry, where numerous stakeholders, including aircraft manufacturers, engineering test officials, and regulatory bodies like the FAA, ensure comprehensive safety standards. However, in the case of deep-sea exploration, such rigorous oversight is absent.
Operational Lifetime
The Ocean Gate submersible itself was an impressive engineering achievement, constructed with a carbon fiber layup, composite structure, and titanium components. It offered a viewing window (even though tiny and hard to see out of) for exploring the Titanic, enabling feats that were previously impossible. However, every engineering device has an operational lifetime, determined through testing to determine its endurance and safety margin. For example, aircraft undergo regular inspections and complete overhauls to identify any flaws or stress concentrations that could lead to failure. After a specific number of operational hours, an aircraft is retired, even if it could potentially continue flying safely. This concept of an operational lifetime seems crucial, but it remains uncertain whether the Titan submersible had a defined operational lifetime or underwent non-destructive testing to assess the condition of its carbon fiber components.
Carbon fiber
Carbon fiber is a relatively new engineering material, distinct from the extensively studied high-strength steel and aluminum. It offers impressive strength and performance but lacks a century of historical knowledge and experience. Venturing into new frontiers, such as deep-sea exploration, can be exciting and glamorous, like the upcoming space tourism industry. However, these endeavors also come with unknown risks and challenges. Building vessels capable of withstanding the immense pressures of the deep ocean involves dealing with many unknown variables, lacking a well-established playbook. Commercial versions of such vessels are scarce due to the complexities involved.
It appears that the Titan submersible experienced some form of deformation or structural failure over a few cycles. While it successfully descended and resurfaced three times, it crumpled on the fourth attempt. In my opinion, no vessel exploring the Mariana Trench or depths of 12,000 feet in the Atlantic should have an extended operational lifetime. It is likely that Stockton Rush, the founder of Ocean Gate, aimed to make tickets for these expeditions more affordable. However, the price range of $125,000 to $250,000 might not have been sufficient. A more realistic cost would have been around one to one and a half million dollars, allowing for periodic vessel replacements or comprehensive disruptive testing to replace critical components.
In conclusion, the implosion of the Ocean Gate submersible highlights the lack of regulatory oversight in deep-sea exploration and the importance of defining operational lifetimes, conducting thorough testing, and accounting for the unknowns associated with new engineering materials and frontiers. Safety and robust protocols should always remain paramount, even in the pursuit of ambitious and groundbreaking endeavors.
-CET
3/12/2023
As the field of artificial intelligence (AI) evolves, it presents unique challenges to the existing framework of intellectual property (IP) laws. The emergence of AI technology has raised questions about patentability, copyright, trade secrets, and ownership rights. In this blog post, we explore the ongoing discussions and efforts by organizations such as the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to address these concerns and provide guidance for protecting AI-related innovations.
The Need for New IP Regimes
Traditional IP categories do not always neatly align with certain aspects of AI. For example, training data sets, which inform machine learning models, may not be patentable or subject to copyright. They could instead be treated as trade secrets. This realization has sparked discussions about the necessity of developing new IP regimes that cater specifically to AI-related technology. Adapting the existing system to accommodate the involvement of computers and artificial intelligence in the invention process is a significant challenge.
The USPTO's Exploration and Guidance
The USPTO has recognized the impact of AI on IP and has actively sought input from the public and stakeholders in the field. Through notices published in the Federal Register, the USPTO invited discussions on various AI-related topics, including patents, copyright, trade secrets, databases, and trademark law. The comment period has ended, and the USPTO is now evaluating the input received. They plan to release guidance in the spring, summarizing the comments and offering preliminary thoughts on the intersection of AI and IP.
The Role of Legislation and Regulation
Defining what is patentable, and protectable under copyright, and identifying the author or inventor in AI-related innovations may require legislative intervention. The current interpretation of IP laws assumes human inventors and creators. To provide order and predictability for companies investing in R&D and technology development, intelligent regulation is essential. Creating a system where companies have confidence in the protection of their ideas is crucial for fostering innovation and progress.
Navigating Uncertainty for IP Clients
The uncertainty surrounding AI-related IP poses challenges for both companies developing IP in-house and those acquiring technologies. Companies must explore strategies to protect their IP assets and ensure the enforcement of their rights. Monitoring developments from organizations like the USPTO and staying informed about ongoing dialogues is vital. Establishing a comprehensive IP strategy, coupled with the ethical implementation of AI, becomes increasingly important in this dynamic landscape.
Promoting Innovation and Economic Growth
While there may be debates about the scope of IP protection for AI-generated works, there is a recognition of the significant business interest in safeguarding technical innovations through patents. Governments strive to strike a balance that encourages innovation, incentivizes disclosure, and justifies the substantial investments made in R&D. By facilitating the protection and advancement of technology, these efforts contribute to pushing the economy forward.
As AI continues to reshape industries and technology landscapes, the need for robust IP frameworks becomes evident. The ongoing discussions and actions taken by organizations like the USPTO highlight the importance of addressing the unique challenges posed by AI-related inventions. By fostering an environment that encourages innovation, provides clarity, and protects IP rights, we can ensure a thriving ecosystem for AI-driven advancements.
-CET
5/4/2022
Patent claims effectively define what aspects of your invention others are not allowed to use, make, or sell without your permission. Claims are checked for infringement, making them essential in protecting your invention. While you don't necessarily need to write your own claims as an inventor, understanding how they work ensures your patent application covers the important aspects of your invention.
A patent claim is similar to a deed for real estate, specifying exactly what the invention is and what others are prohibited from doing without permission. Claims are the focus when determining infringement. A regular patent application includes claims, while provisional applications may or may not have them. We'll provide simple claim drafting examples to illustrate how claims work.
For instance, we'll consider a hypothetical claim for a car with a vinyl roof, which provides advantages in styling flexibility. We'll introduce the concept of independent and dependent claims, where the latter further restricts or limits the invention described in the former. Dependent claims can include additional features or structures not present in the independent claim. Having a range of claims, from broad to specific, is generally considered advantageous in a patent application.
When reading and proofreading claims, it's important to ensure that they don't introduce new terms not explained in the written description. Verifiability and discoverability are also key considerations, as you should be able to determine if someone is making, using, or selling your invention. We provide examples to illustrate these concepts.
By understanding the basics of patent claims, you'll be better equipped to review claims in your own patent application and ensure they accurately protect your invention. These insights will be valuable as you develop your patent applications.
-CET
2/21/2020
The appearance of a product is crucial. It sets our products apart, makes them stand out, and appeals to consumers. But what happens when someone tries to steal your unique design? That's where design patents come in. Design patents protect the unique visual design of a functional product, allowing inventors to safeguard their original creations and enjoy the rewards of their hard work and creativity.
Design patents can cover a wide range of items, including clothing, jewelry, furniture, and household goods, as long as the design is new, non-obvious, and not purely functional. The great thing is that design applications have a high rate of acceptance. The process of obtaining a design patent is simple but can take some time. You need to prepare and file a detailed application that includes drawings of your design. After that, you'll have to wait for the patent office to examine and approve your application.
It's important to remember that design patents protect the appearance of a product, not its functional aspects. Even with a design patent, others can copy the functional aspects of your product as long as they make it look different. Therefore, the purpose of a design patent is simple: to protect your new and unique designs so that you can continue creating beautifully looking products without the fear of theft.
-CET
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.